For all your private medical practice needs

pete@medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk

01902 280 442

Hilton Hall, Hilton Lane, Wolverhampton, WV11 2BQ

A group of surgeons I know is having problems getting paid by insurance companies.

Not just an individual insurance company but all insurance companies.

The practice manager claimed there were many invoices unpaid by insurance companies 3 months after the consultation or episode date.

This was all the fault of the insurance companies who simply do not want to pay.

I found this odd as in my experience ALL the insurance companies I deal with pay well before 3 months have elapsed.

The practice manager therefore altered the patient’s terms and conditions to read “patients will be asked to pay anything not settled after three months”.

This is, in his words “a long stop” and would prevent the issue arising.

I’m not convinced however putting such a plaster over the wound is the correct action to take.plaster

 

I’m definitely not convinced a “long stop” will prevent the problem because it will allow the invoices to become three months old and then do something about them.

I raised the following two points with the consultants and their Practice Manager:

  1. the patient is ultimately liable for payment anyway. The contract is between the consultant and the patient. Not the consultant and the patient’s insurance company. Whilst it is useful to insert the “three months” clause it would have been better to add it was ultimately the patient’s liability anyway as well.
  2. Is the “three month’s clause” not missing the point entirely? WHY aren’t the invoices being paid within three months?

 

It’s this second point that is the more relevant of the two.

The Enemy

Insurance companies are NOT the enemy.

Of course, I disagree with many of their fee reductions.

I also disagree when they decree certain multi procedures are now deemed to be part and parcel of each other.

The reason for my disagreement is obvious. I’m here to get the maximum amount of revenue for my clients.

Anything that reduces such revenue is not good.

Nonetheless, insurance companies should not be treated as if they are the enemy.

Insurance companies WILL settle a claim within 3 months. I can honestly say I don’t have a single invoice for one of my clients sent to an insurance company still unpaid after three months.

So why are the group of surgeons referred to earlier having problems and introducing the “three-month” rule?

Without even drilling too far down into how and when the surgeons were invoicing, I can tell you the probable cause and why they subsequently feel the rule is necessary.

1.  Invoices are not being raised immediately or at worse within seven days of the episode date

2. Invoices that are raised are incomplete and not accurate.

That is why the invoices are not being paid earlier than the consultants are currently experiencing.

It is all about getting it right the first time.

The first means having a clinic list or a theatre list invoiced promptly with all the details required by the insurance company appearing correctly on the invoice.

Putting the effort in upfront always generates the best results. It may be tiresome and it may be an inconvenience to have to stop, make a phone call so you DO have the correct details but it pays in the long run.

Its also all about 30 days after the invoice has been transmitted to an insurance company if it is still unpaid, getting them on the phone and asking if there is a problem.

If there is, it gets sorted immediately.

In other words, the invoice is not allowed to be dated more than three months from the episode or consultation date.

Invoice Regularly

Consider it this way.

If you invoice quickly and invoice correctly, the number of potential issues that may delay payment reduces considerably.

You simply must make it easy for a private medical insurance company to deal with your invoices.  I actually said that to a consultant surgeon recently who wasn’t sure he agreed until I asked him if he liked money or not?

Obviously, he said he did.

Therefore, my statement was correct.

As regards the consultants who have now introduced the “three-month rule” the rule itself should be entirely unnecessary.

The cause of the problem should be examined and steps are taken to prevent the invoices from becoming more than three months old.

pete@medicalhealthcaremanagement.co.uk